Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:11-16

11 Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another. 

12 And ye shall not swear by my name falsely, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord. 

13 Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour, neither rob him: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning. 

14 Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumblingblock before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord. 

15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour. 

16 Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the Lord.

The first two verses sound like we are back to retelling the ten commandments, the prohibition against stealing being the eighth commandment, and not taking the Lord’s name in vain being the third. Verse 13-16 have echoes of not bearing false witness, which is the ninth commandment, but they go deeper here, calling out various way that we might cheat and abuse our fellow man.

Verse 13 calls on us to be earnest in doing right by our fellow man, including not withholding his wages for a single day. If you have what is rightfully his, you must give it immediately. Though you may not have ever contemplated stealing from him, you must also not deprive him for a single night.

“Cursing the deaf” is an interesting concept, as obviously he would not hear the insult. And while a blind person would be hurt by a stumblingblock in his path, he would not be able to see you put it there. In both cases you could likely get away with the insult and injury, you will not have to answer to anyone in this life, and that is what makes them so perverse. They are seeking to create a permanent imbalance in the universe, to sin and get away with it, frustrating the cosmic scales of justice. This is the exact inverse of Jesus’s injunction that we do our alms (acts of kindness and mercy to our fellow man) in secret. Giving a gift that cannot be thanked or rewarded is the purest form of goodness to our fellow man, so causing secret harm is the most depraved form of evil to our fellow man. Both types of secret acts will be accounted for with God, though.

Verse 15 makes the interesting point that in judgment, or in matters of the law, we must not prefer one side over the other, not even the more vulnerable and weak. We must not overlook the crimes of the poor because they are poor, and certainly not those of the mighty because they are mighty. This is a very pertinent commandment for our day, where many speak in favor of being a “respecter of persons,” calling on us to give preference based on race, sex, nationality, ability, and sexuality. It is wrong to do, though, whichever direction we would apply those preferences.

Finally, verse 16 also says that we must not “stand against the blood of our neighbor.” This commonly has two interpretations. The first is that we must not testify falsely against our neighbor or abstain from testifying truthfully in his favor. The second is that we must not stand idly by while our neighbor comes to harm. We must at all times be willing to protect, intervene, and support our neighbor against all evil. Being a coward in the face of danger will never be justified.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:9-10

9 And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy harvest. 

10 And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather every grape of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I am the Lord your God.

Now we move to one of the hospitality laws of Ancient Israel, which was that any person who grew a field of produce must leave the corners unharvested, freely available to the poor and to the foreigner, who might gain sustenance in their time of need. This, of course, would be integral to the story of Ruth, who met her future husband Boaz by gleaning in his field, as she tried to sustain both herself and her mother-in-law Naomi.

This represents a perpetual sacrifice to the greater good. The farmer who grew the field would gain no direct benefit from leaving part of his field unharvested. Whether the poor were sustained or perished would likely have very little effect upon him. But it would help the health of the community as a whole. It would provide an opportunity to those who most needed it. It would foster a greater sense of unity and quell antisocial acts by those who were most desperate. It would improve the economy of the nation as a whole. Surely, then, that would have positive effects on the farmer’s generations, even if not immediately to him in the moment of his sacrifice.

This is the principle of planting the tree that you will not be around to feel the shade of, going to war to die for the freedoms of people you will never know, or doing an act of kindness in secret so that no one can repay you. It is doing good to make the world better, to make things better for our children and our community but not gaining any personal benefit from it. Well, aside from the most important benefit: the purifying of our own soul and gaining an invitation to the table of the Lord.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:5-8

5 And if ye offer a sacrifice of peace offerings unto the Lord, ye shall offer it at your own will. 

6 It shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow: and if ought remain until the third day, it shall be burnt in the fire. 

7 And if it be eaten at all on the third day, it is abominable; it shall not be accepted. 

8 Therefore every one that eateth it shall bear his iniquity, because he hath profaned the hallowed thing of the Lord: and that soul shall be cut off from among his people.

We shift from a recounting of some of the ten commandments to now reiterating the importance of eating one’s portion of a peace offering within the day or the day after making that sacrifice, then burning any remainder on the third day. This was something we originally read about back in Leviticus 7.

As we may recall, the peace offering was not performed for restitution from sin or uncleanliness. As verse 5 states, it was an entirely voluntary offering, presumably given when one felt a particular sense of communion with God and wanted to enjoy a meal at His table. But what was a voluntary offering could become a curse if the offeror violated its instructions and ate his portion past the days allotted to him to do so. So long as the offering was in his own possession, he could slaughter and eat of it whenever and however he pleased, but once he offered it to the Lord, it now became subject to the Lord’s stipulations, and if he varied from that then his gift would become a curse.

So it is with us and our sacrifices today. When we say that we give our lives, our passion, our work, our families to the Lord, we cannot simply mean that we want to invite Him into those, and to bless them as we continue to direct them according to our own preferences. If we truly say that we are offering these things to Him, then that means we now accept His direction overwriting our own in each of these domains.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:1-4

1 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 

2 Speak unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, and say unto them, Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy. 

3 Ye shall fear every man his mother, and his father, and keep my sabbaths: I am the Lord your God. 

4 Turn ye not unto idols, nor make to yourselves molten gods: I am the Lord your God.

Here we launch into yet another list of commandments from the Lord to the Israelites, many of them echoing laws that we have already heard. It is worth wondering, why so many repetitions of similar instructions? I suppose it could be that these were separate reminders that Moses made at different times to Israel. Perhaps after a year or two in the wilderness they were showing improper tendencies, and God instructed Moses to give them a refresher.

What I personally consider to be more likely, however, is that over the centuries there were multiple records of the laws given by Moses, and rather than trying to determine which accounting was the definitive one, the scribes decided to include both. This current list of commandments will continue into the next chapter, where we will see many of the same exact prohibitions as were in Leviticus 18, though with some alternate details, such as describing specific punishments for sin.

What we have here today seems to be another retelling of the ten commandments, including familiar laws such honoring one’s father and mother (the fifth commandment), observing the sabbath (the fourth commandment), not worshipping idols (the second commandment), and holding only the Lord as their God (the first commandment). It is interesting to note that these are in descending order, meaning laid out in reverse order from what we saw in Exodus 20, and by this today’s verses create a sort of ascension in priority. The original ten commandments are presented with the highest ethics first (worshipping God) and then stating all the other commandments that flow downstream from that: observe the sabbath → honor your parents → don’t covet what your neighbor has. But now we are shown how concern for the lower things (honoring your parents), naturally leads to the higher (having the Lord as your God). Whether we start at the highest ideal and orient everything below according to it or start with what is most immediately good before us and from that raise our aim to what is above, we find the right way of life.

Posted on by Abe Austin

The Walls of Conviction

Not the clamoring of society, not the armies of a nation, and not even the legions of the devil can break through the walls of a man’s conviction. His fortress is only breached when he opens the door from within.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Salvation Comes by Submission

If it is not necessary to conform to the will of God, then you are greater than your god, then your god is not a higher power, then you have no divine force to rely on when things turn against you.

The hope of being saved is incompatible with the insistence of doing your own will. Salvation comes by submission.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 18:29-30

29 For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people. 

30 Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the Lord your God.

In my last post I mentioned how there does seem to be a period of ripening in sin before the earth “vomits” out the wicked, and God visits them with destruction and expulsion. Today’s verses further reinforce this notion that God recognizes degrees of corruption among the people. Here He speaks of a nation that is still broadly and officially aligned with His will, but which has the inevitable pervert who defies God’s commandments. God tells the people that these stray defilers must be cut off from the people.

There is a difference between the nation that at least tries to hold to God’s standard, and which has individual rebellions that are reproved by the state, and a nation that has embraced perversion as its state doctrine. It is the latter that faces being violently spued out by God and the earth, as there no longer remains any government authority to rectify it instead. It is therefore the nation that has sunk to this level of systematic depravtiy that should live in fear of judgment.

Let us also take a moment to consider the punishment of being “cut off from among the people.” This could mean various things, dependent upon the severity of the actual crime. We will see some instances where it means execution, others where it means religious excommunication, and still others that seem to suggest exile. All of these are different degrees of that which is perverse and hell-oriented being cut off from the whole that is good and upward striving.

Posted on by Abe Austin · 1 Comment

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 18:24-28

24 Defile not ye yourselves in any of these things: for in all these the nations are defiled which I cast out before you: 

25 And the land is defiled: therefore I do visit the iniquity thereof upon it, and the land itself vomiteth out her inhabitants. 

26 Ye shall therefore keep my statutes and my judgments, and shall not commit any of these abominations; neither any of your own nation, nor any stranger that sojourneth among you: 

27 (For all these abominations have the men of the land done, which were before you, and the land is defiled;) 

28 That the land spue not you out also, when ye defile it, as it spued out the nations that were before you.

In my last post I mentioned how the deepest evils that God expressly forbade in this chapter are associated throughout the Bible with nations that are soon to be destroyed. And, as it turns out, God makes that point explicit in these verses. He directly points out that these are the practices that the current inhabitants of Canaan are ripe with, and that is why He will drive out those perverse people with the armies of Israel. He even dramatically describes the earth “vomiting” out those people who engage in such wickedness within it.

As we know, eventually the Israelites would also fall to these and other works of wickedness, and they would indeed be spued out of the land as well. In fact, it would occur to them more than once. It is not entirely clear whether this pattern that God is describing applies to all people in all places, or only to specially sanctified lands, such as Canaan. The Book of Mormon does make similar language about the Americas. At the very least, after the ministry of Jesus Christ we know that all the world became the field of spiritual harvest. We also know that in the last days all manner of wickedness will prevail and the earth will vomit out those depraved actors in all places as a result.

Thus, whether it was the case in ancient times or not, at least now it seems clear that every people and every land are under this threat of destruction and expulsion for engaging with these sins. There does seem to be a time of ripening before the sword comes down, and that delay can give people a reason to deny the correlation, but the wise will heed the word of God and see the pattern for what it is.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 18:21-23

21 And thou shalt not let any of thy seed pass through the fire to Molech, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord. 

22 Thou shalt not lie with mankind, as with womankind: it is abomination. 

23 Neither shalt thou lie with any beast to defile thyself therewith: neither shall any woman stand before a beast to lie down thereto: it is confusion.

We come to one of the first passages explicitly forbidding homosexuality here in Leviticus 18:22. I find it very compelling to consider the immediate context this commandment is found within. It is right after the commandment to not sacrifice human children, and right before the commandment to not commit bestiality. That makes it very clear the category of sin that this behavior occupies and the foolishness in thinking that it would ever be rescinded. Many like to compare it to the commandments to not eat pork or wear mixed fabrics, but that is not the context in which it actually appears. Rather, it is listed among the most perverse and evil acts imaginable.

Speaking of which, it seems like it should hardly be necessary to declare that one should not burn their children as a sacrifice or have sexual relations with animals. Even absent commandments from God, these should universally be considered perverse and evil acts. Still, there is value in having God call them out directly anyway. None can say, “well God never spoke on it.” He spoke on it in our hearts, and He spoke on it in His word just to be sure that there could be no excuse. And yet these behaviors are still performed and are still excused, even today. In fact, child murder has become more standardized and ritualized in our abortion culture than perhaps any culture that came before. It may be the same with homosexuality as well. So far, at least, bestiality has remained only a dark, fringe practice…but who knows what the future holds.

The presence of the darkest sins imaginable in our modern society does raise the question of whether we are not on the brink of a divine scourging. The deepest depravity of man recorded in the scriptures we see manifested in our day, so it may not be long before the judgments of God recorded in the scriptures we see manifested also.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 18:17-20

17 Thou shalt not uncover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter, neither shalt thou take her son’s daughter, or her daughter’s daughter, to uncover her nakedness; for they are her near kinswomen: it is wickedness. 

18 Neither shalt thou take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness, beside the other in her life time. 

19 Also thou shalt not approach unto a woman to uncover her nakedness, as long as she is put apart for her uncleanness. 

20 Moreover thou shalt not lie carnally with thy neighbour’s wife, to defile thyself with her.

We have been discussing relationships that were too close to permit sexual relations. Today continues that pattern, but extending beyond familial relationships to others. It points out the perversion of sleeping with both a woman (apparently not as her original husband) and her daughter. The mother and the daughter are too near to one another and should not be so intimately linked to the same man.

Verse 18 continues this idea by further prohibiting marrying one woman, and then also marrying her sister. Once again, we do see a patriarch who was on the wrong side of this, Jacob was famously married to both Rachel and her sister, Leah. Of course, that was not his intention but came about by trickery from his father-in-law Laban.

Verse 20 also shows how a neighbor’s wife is too close of a relationship for you to be mixing with. Of course, there is the matter of fornication that already makes such a relationship forbidden, but perhaps this is saying there is even an extra offense if the person you fornicate with is a neighbor. We are also instructed not to lay with a woman during her period or other times of uncleanness.

In all, we are being told that there is such a thing as situational transgression. A woman might in other cases be eligible to woo, but because of a shared element, now becomes too close for anything like that. Before a man and woman become closer than any other, there must first be a sufficient gap between them.