Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:20-22

20 And whosoever lieth carnally with a woman, that is a bondmaid, betrothed to an husband, and not at all redeemed, nor freedom given her; she shall be scourged; they shall not be put to death, because she was not free. 

21 And he shall bring his trespass offering unto the Lord, unto the door of the tabernacle of the congregation, even a ram for a trespass offering. 

22 And the priest shall make an atonement for him with the ram of the trespass offering before the Lord for his sin which he hath done: and the sin which he hath done shall be forgiven him.

Today’s verses deal with a controversial subject: fornication with a bondwoman. There doesn’t seem to be any distinction in the language as to whether this is referring only to a foreign Canaanite woman, or an Israelite daughter who is an indentured servant, or both. In any case, the matter here is clearly fornication, not rape, which is handled elsewhere. Also, I say fornication because it fits are modern vernacular where the woman is unmarried, but she is betrothed, and in Ancient Israel that would have elevated the crime to the level of adultery.

In regular cases, adultery was an immediate death sentence for both parties. Hence the woman taken in adultery brought as a test to Jesus to see if he would approve of stoning her. But as we see today, this was actually only the punishment for free persons. The law recognized servants as not having the same privileges, and therefore they were not subject to the same punishments. As we have seen in several cases, the law was designed with protections around the vulnerable. In one sense it was no respecter of persons, condemning all for the same sinful behaviors, creating no class who could just get away with wrongdoing. At the same time, it would change the range of applicable punishment, always retaining the greatest penalty for those with the greatest opportunity.

Verse 20 describes the woman’s punishment as “she shall be scourged,” but this is a highly debated translation. The Hebrew word used here, בִּקּרֶת (biqqoreth), means “examination, i.e. (by implication) punishment — scourged” (Strong’s Concordance). There is nothing that actually makes certain that the word was meant to be scourged here, instead of investigated, nor anything that links it to the woman only. This passage could just as easily read “they shall be scourged” or “they shall be investigated.” Indeed, almost every translation today does use one of those other interpretations.

What is clear is that separate from whatever punishment is described in verse 20, the man involved in the offense would have to make a trespass offering. After this, both parties could apparently be forgiven.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:19

19 Ye shall keep my statutes. Thou shalt not let thy cattle gender with a diverse kind: thou shalt not sow thy field with mingled seed: neither shall a garment mingled of linen and woollen come upon thee.

Verse 19 is about keeping things separate and pure, not mixing parts together. It can be seen as a continuation of the laws against eating unclean meat and not using leaven during the Passover. All of this, of course, is a symbol of being a separate and chosen people. Though Israel would necessarily live alongside pagan cultures, they were not to mix faiths, not to corrupt their worship of God. Unfortunately, Israel would on many occasions fall into this very error and would lose their kingdom because of it.

Of course, we cannot judge them too harshly. Corruption of the faith is a very real problem in our day, too. There are many “Christians” who are more converted to the trends of our current society than their actual doctrine, seeking to blend fabrics of love and tolerance with sins like homosexuality, to give just one example. Mankind has ever been too concerned with looking right according to the current social standard, and not in being right in God’s eyes.

It is interesting that it is this particular verse has become a favorite go-to for those wanting to discount the Bible’s commandments against homosexuality. “Why do you hold to the Bible’s condemnation of gay people, but you still wear clothes with mixed fabrics?” The answer is that, as previously mentioned, the mixed fabric law was part of the unclean meats and leaven laws, which was explicitly withdrawn in Acts 10, whereas the sins of sexual immorality have never been rescinded. Still, it is ironic and poetic that people attempt to justify homosexuality by referencing the very category of commandments that symbolically opposed the mingling of faith with the immoral trends of the day.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:17-18

17 Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart: thou shalt in any wise rebuke thy neighbour, and not suffer sin upon him. 

18 Thou shalt not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of thy people, but thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself: I am the Lord.

Today’s two commandments are very interesting. While all the previous ones have been prohibitions against what you do, today’s venture into prohibitions as to what you permit yourself to feel. “Thou shalt not hate thy brother in thine heart” and “thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself” can be very difficult commandments to follow, as they require an emotional state that we may not naturally feel.

In my own experience I have learned that while the presence of hate and the absence of love might be my natural state towards any individual in particular, it is possible to change them over time. By not dwelling on the hate when it arises, it does eventually go away. By seeking to do kind acts even in the absence of love, eventually the love returns. Thus, I do not believe that we are condemned by being amiss in these things in a single moment, but only if we will not train our hearts to love and be kind with the time that we have.

It is also interesting to note how these two laws in the Old Testament point to the higher law that would come later. I think we do not often remember that when Jesus said that the second greatest commandment was to “thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself,” (Mark 12:31) he was not presenting a new idea, he was quoting himself as Jehovah in today’s verses. And he was also quoting the Old Testament for what he gave as the first great commandment, to love God with all our hearts. (see Mark 12:30 and Deuteronomy 6:5).

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:11-16

11 Ye shall not steal, neither deal falsely, neither lie one to another. 

12 And ye shall not swear by my name falsely, neither shalt thou profane the name of thy God: I am the Lord. 

13 Thou shalt not defraud thy neighbour, neither rob him: the wages of him that is hired shall not abide with thee all night until the morning. 

14 Thou shalt not curse the deaf, nor put a stumblingblock before the blind, but shalt fear thy God: I am the Lord. 

15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: but in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour. 

16 Thou shalt not go up and down as a talebearer among thy people: neither shalt thou stand against the blood of thy neighbour: I am the Lord.

The first two verses sound like we are back to retelling the ten commandments, the prohibition against stealing being the eighth commandment, and not taking the Lord’s name in vain being the third. Verse 13-16 have echoes of not bearing false witness, which is the ninth commandment, but they go deeper here, calling out various way that we might cheat and abuse our fellow man.

Verse 13 calls on us to be earnest in doing right by our fellow man, including not withholding his wages for a single day. If you have what is rightfully his, you must give it immediately. Though you may not have ever contemplated stealing from him, you must also not deprive him for a single night.

“Cursing the deaf” is an interesting concept, as obviously he would not hear the insult. And while a blind person would be hurt by a stumblingblock in his path, he would not be able to see you put it there. In both cases you could likely get away with the insult and injury, you will not have to answer to anyone in this life, and that is what makes them so perverse. They are seeking to create a permanent imbalance in the universe, to sin and get away with it, frustrating the cosmic scales of justice. This is the exact inverse of Jesus’s injunction that we do our alms (acts of kindness and mercy to our fellow man) in secret. Giving a gift that cannot be thanked or rewarded is the purest form of goodness to our fellow man, so causing secret harm is the most depraved form of evil to our fellow man. Both types of secret acts will be accounted for with God, though.

Verse 15 makes the interesting point that in judgment, or in matters of the law, we must not prefer one side over the other, not even the more vulnerable and weak. We must not overlook the crimes of the poor because they are poor, and certainly not those of the mighty because they are mighty. This is a very pertinent commandment for our day, where many speak in favor of being a “respecter of persons,” calling on us to give preference based on race, sex, nationality, ability, and sexuality. It is wrong to do, though, whichever direction we would apply those preferences.

Finally, verse 16 also says that we must not “stand against the blood of our neighbor.” This commonly has two interpretations. The first is that we must not testify falsely against our neighbor or abstain from testifying truthfully in his favor. The second is that we must not stand idly by while our neighbor comes to harm. We must at all times be willing to protect, intervene, and support our neighbor against all evil. Being a coward in the face of danger will never be justified.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:9-10

9 And when ye reap the harvest of your land, thou shalt not wholly reap the corners of thy field, neither shalt thou gather the gleanings of thy harvest. 

10 And thou shalt not glean thy vineyard, neither shalt thou gather every grape of thy vineyard; thou shalt leave them for the poor and stranger: I am the Lord your God.

Now we move to one of the hospitality laws of Ancient Israel, which was that any person who grew a field of produce must leave the corners unharvested, freely available to the poor and to the foreigner, who might gain sustenance in their time of need. This, of course, would be integral to the story of Ruth, who met her future husband Boaz by gleaning in his field, as she tried to sustain both herself and her mother-in-law Naomi.

This represents a perpetual sacrifice to the greater good. The farmer who grew the field would gain no direct benefit from leaving part of his field unharvested. Whether the poor were sustained or perished would likely have very little effect upon him. But it would help the health of the community as a whole. It would provide an opportunity to those who most needed it. It would foster a greater sense of unity and quell antisocial acts by those who were most desperate. It would improve the economy of the nation as a whole. Surely, then, that would have positive effects on the farmer’s generations, even if not immediately to him in the moment of his sacrifice.

This is the principle of planting the tree that you will not be around to feel the shade of, going to war to die for the freedoms of people you will never know, or doing an act of kindness in secret so that no one can repay you. It is doing good to make the world better, to make things better for our children and our community but not gaining any personal benefit from it. Well, aside from the most important benefit: the purifying of our own soul and gaining an invitation to the table of the Lord.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:5-8

5 And if ye offer a sacrifice of peace offerings unto the Lord, ye shall offer it at your own will. 

6 It shall be eaten the same day ye offer it, and on the morrow: and if ought remain until the third day, it shall be burnt in the fire. 

7 And if it be eaten at all on the third day, it is abominable; it shall not be accepted. 

8 Therefore every one that eateth it shall bear his iniquity, because he hath profaned the hallowed thing of the Lord: and that soul shall be cut off from among his people.

We shift from a recounting of some of the ten commandments to now reiterating the importance of eating one’s portion of a peace offering within the day or the day after making that sacrifice, then burning any remainder on the third day. This was something we originally read about back in Leviticus 7.

As we may recall, the peace offering was not performed for restitution from sin or uncleanliness. As verse 5 states, it was an entirely voluntary offering, presumably given when one felt a particular sense of communion with God and wanted to enjoy a meal at His table. But what was a voluntary offering could become a curse if the offeror violated its instructions and ate his portion past the days allotted to him to do so. So long as the offering was in his own possession, he could slaughter and eat of it whenever and however he pleased, but once he offered it to the Lord, it now became subject to the Lord’s stipulations, and if he varied from that then his gift would become a curse.

So it is with us and our sacrifices today. When we say that we give our lives, our passion, our work, our families to the Lord, we cannot simply mean that we want to invite Him into those, and to bless them as we continue to direct them according to our own preferences. If we truly say that we are offering these things to Him, then that means we now accept His direction overwriting our own in each of these domains.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 19:1-4

1 And the Lord spake unto Moses, saying, 

2 Speak unto all the congregation of the children of Israel, and say unto them, Ye shall be holy: for I the Lord your God am holy. 

3 Ye shall fear every man his mother, and his father, and keep my sabbaths: I am the Lord your God. 

4 Turn ye not unto idols, nor make to yourselves molten gods: I am the Lord your God.

Here we launch into yet another list of commandments from the Lord to the Israelites, many of them echoing laws that we have already heard. It is worth wondering, why so many repetitions of similar instructions? I suppose it could be that these were separate reminders that Moses made at different times to Israel. Perhaps after a year or two in the wilderness they were showing improper tendencies, and God instructed Moses to give them a refresher.

What I personally consider to be more likely, however, is that over the centuries there were multiple records of the laws given by Moses, and rather than trying to determine which accounting was the definitive one, the scribes decided to include both. This current list of commandments will continue into the next chapter, where we will see many of the same exact prohibitions as were in Leviticus 18, though with some alternate details, such as describing specific punishments for sin.

What we have here today seems to be another retelling of the ten commandments, including familiar laws such honoring one’s father and mother (the fifth commandment), observing the sabbath (the fourth commandment), not worshipping idols (the second commandment), and holding only the Lord as their God (the first commandment). It is interesting to note that these are in descending order, meaning laid out in reverse order from what we saw in Exodus 20, and by this today’s verses create a sort of ascension in priority. The original ten commandments are presented with the highest ethics first (worshipping God) and then stating all the other commandments that flow downstream from that: observe the sabbath → honor your parents → don’t covet what your neighbor has. But now we are shown how concern for the lower things (honoring your parents), naturally leads to the higher (having the Lord as your God). Whether we start at the highest ideal and orient everything below according to it or start with what is most immediately good before us and from that raise our aim to what is above, we find the right way of life.

Posted on by Abe Austin

The Walls of Conviction

Not the clamoring of society, not the armies of a nation, and not even the legions of the devil can break through the walls of a man’s conviction. His fortress is only breached when he opens the door from within.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Salvation Comes by Submission

If it is not necessary to conform to the will of God, then you are greater than your god, then your god is not a higher power, then you have no divine force to rely on when things turn against you.

The hope of being saved is incompatible with the insistence of doing your own will. Salvation comes by submission.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 18:29-30

29 For whosoever shall commit any of these abominations, even the souls that commit them shall be cut off from among their people. 

30 Therefore shall ye keep mine ordinance, that ye commit not any one of these abominable customs, which were committed before you, and that ye defile not yourselves therein: I am the Lord your God.

In my last post I mentioned how there does seem to be a period of ripening in sin before the earth “vomits” out the wicked, and God visits them with destruction and expulsion. Today’s verses further reinforce this notion that God recognizes degrees of corruption among the people. Here He speaks of a nation that is still broadly and officially aligned with His will, but which has the inevitable pervert who defies God’s commandments. God tells the people that these stray defilers must be cut off from the people.

There is a difference between the nation that at least tries to hold to God’s standard, and which has individual rebellions that are reproved by the state, and a nation that has embraced perversion as its state doctrine. It is the latter that faces being violently spued out by God and the earth, as there no longer remains any government authority to rectify it instead. It is therefore the nation that has sunk to this level of systematic depravtiy that should live in fear of judgment.

Let us also take a moment to consider the punishment of being “cut off from among the people.” This could mean various things, dependent upon the severity of the actual crime. We will see some instances where it means execution, others where it means religious excommunication, and still others that seem to suggest exile. All of these are different degrees of that which is perverse and hell-oriented being cut off from the whole that is good and upward striving.