Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 11:32-35

32 And upon whatsoever any of them, when they are dead, doth fall, it shall be unclean; whether it be any vessel of wood, or raiment, or skin, or sack, whatsoever vessel it be, wherein any work is done, it must be put into water, and it shall be unclean until the even; so it shall be cleansed.

33 And every earthen vessel, whereinto any of them falleth, whatsoever is in it shall be unclean; and ye shall break it.

34 Of all meat which may be eaten, that on which such water cometh shall be unclean: and all drink that may be drunk in every such vessel shall be unclean.

35 And every thing whereupon any part of their carcase falleth shall be unclean; whether it be oven, or ranges for pots, they shall be broken down: for they are unclean, and shall be unclean unto you.

Today we hear how an unclean animal’s carcass touching an instrument would also make that instrument unclean. It does specify throughout these verses that this only applies to dead unclean animals, not living ones. So, there are degrees to the polluting effect of uncleanness.

Tools or clothes or sacks made unclean in this way only needed to be washed, left for a day, and then could be used again. But food or water or clay pottery that was contaminated were forever unclean and had to be discarded. Again, degrees to the pollution.

Looking at these examples from a modern, practical sense, we recognize that a dead body carries more disease than a living one. We understand how some things can be washed and reused, whereas others are better to purge entirely, particularly the food and drink that we would otherwise bring into our bodies. There are degrees of corruption and there are degrees of protection against them. The tools that we use, the clothes that we wear, our outer skin, and our inner organs, we protect each of these to increasing degrees because we become more susceptible to virus and infection the deeper the contamination reaches.

Looking at this through a spiritual lens, some unworthy behavior is more corrupt and destructive than others. A person deceived by the world, engaging in sin while still maintaining a sense of conscience is like a living unclean beast. A potential source of corruption, but not to the same degree as another person who has become entirely cynical and jaded, turned nihilistic by his sin.

And as with the Israelite’s cleanliness laws, we must protect ourselves from these sinful influences by progressive measures. Blasphemous language in our culture is a problem, but it is worse when it is projected through the television into our homes, and it is even worse again when it is coming out of our own mouths. And so on for all sins. Sin is pervasive enough that we cannot avoid all contact with it, but we can put in progressive checks and protections the closer it comes to our heart.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 11:29-31

29 These also shall be unclean unto you among the creeping things that creep upon the earth; the weasel, and the mouse, and the tortoise after his kind,

30 And the ferret, and the chameleon, and the lizard, and the snail, and the mole.

31 These are unclean to you among all that creep: whosoever doth touch them, when they be dead, shall be unclean until the even.

Today’s verses call out individual animals that would also be unclean to the Israelites. First among them are rodents and reptiles, then also snails and moles. Of course, each of these would have already been forbidden under the existing laws: rodents and reptiles do not have split hooves, snails don’t have raised legs for leaping, and moles violate both requirements, whether you consider them a beast or a “creeping thing.”

Presumably these animals are called out as edge case examples, showing that if an animal seems like it might be unclean, it is unclean. So it is in moral life. We may not be able to define every type of sin and every manner of evil, but we can establish principles, provide examples, and then rule out anything else that seems like it might be in violation of those guidelines.

Let us consider one example. Is AI-generated pornography not immoral since it involves unreal characters? The scriptures may not call it out directly, but they do establish a pattern of what God has allowed in regard to sexuality, and we should omit anything questionable around that. God has allowed for a man and a woman to cleave together as one flesh, and He has forbidden extramarital sexuality. Looking at the matter of AI pornography, that starts to sound a lot like a weasel or a tortoise, something on the fringes of more familiar sin, and something we should also treat as unclean.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 11:24-28

24 And for these ye shall be unclean: whosoever toucheth the carcase of them shall be unclean until the even.

25 And whosoever beareth ought of the carcase of them shall wash his clothes, and be unclean until the even.

26 The carcases of every beast which divideth the hoof, and is not clovenfooted, nor cheweth the cud, are unclean unto you: every one that toucheth them shall be unclean.

27 And whatsoever goeth upon his paws, among all manner of beasts that go on all four, those are unclean unto you: whoso toucheth their carcase shall be unclean until the even.

28 And he that beareth the carcase of them shall wash his clothes, and be unclean until the even: they are unclean unto you.

Next, we hear that if an animal was unclean for eating, then it was also unclean to touch its carcass. One could touch a living pig, but if he either tried to eat it or touch its corpse, he would be unclean.

The symbolism is clear here. We want nothing to do with the unclean things of the world, and the death that they cause, whether physical or spiritual. We do not take stolen money, we do not spread rumors, and we do not take joy at the suffering of others. If we are to have success in this world, let us have it honorably and honestly, and not take undue advantage or ill-gotten spoils.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 11:21-23

21 Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth;

22 Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.

23 But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you.

We finally come to the last major category of animal cleanliness, which has to do with the insects. Perhaps not surprisingly, almost the entirety of the insect kingdom is forbidden. The only specimens that are permissible are those with raised legs that can leap or fly. Specifically, it describes locusts, beetles, and grasshoppers.

Perhaps the symbolism here is that only the low creatures that aspire to reach higher could be accepted, just as we are lower than God, but we strive for godliness. This is a beautiful symbol of discipleship. We are not perfect, and we are not going to be so in this life. But still, we leap for it. Not to fool ourselves into thinking we are something that we aren’t, but because it is in the striving and falling short and striving yet again that the best comes out of us. Man’s ambition should always be at least a bit beyond his grasp.

This concludes the main sections of animal cleanliness. In the following verses God describes various other unclean elements and specific animals to be avoided, but the main animal category symbolism is complete. It is a fascinating part of God’s pattern that we are above the animals, yet we can look to them for our own edification. God has provided examples both of good and bad among them and even given us hints for how to recognize each.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 11:13-20

13 And these are they which ye shall have in abomination among the fowls; they shall not be eaten, they are an abomination: the eagle, and the ossifrage, and the ospray,

14 And the vulture, and the kite after his kind;

15 Every raven after his kind;

16 And the owl, and the night hawk, and the cuckow, and the hawk after his kind,

17 And the little owl, and the cormorant, and the great owl,

18 And the swan, and the pelican, and the gier eagle,

19 And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat.

20 All fowls that creep, going upon all four, shall be an abomination unto you.

We have heard the laws of cleanliness for beasts and fish, today we hear them for the birds. For this we are not given a clear defining principle, though, most of this is simply a long list of birds which cannot be eaten.

Looking at the list, however, a pattern does emerge. When we look at hawks, eagles, and osprey, we see that birds of prey are being forbidden. This maintains the pattern seen previously, where other predator animals were also forbidden. God’s people are not to be ravenous or murderous, only standing against the Lord’s foes when commanded, and otherwise establishing peace with all.

We also see forbidden the scavenger birds, such as the vulture and the raven. God’s people are not meant to be opportunists taking advantage of others’ misfortune. We are to prosper by honest labor.

Finally, we also see the dark and the strange flying creatures forbidden. Nocturnal animals like owls and bats must not be eaten. So, too, we must not deal in the dark, make alliances with the shadows, or serve the prince of darkness.

Again, we see the pattern continuing of the laws having a clear symbolism for what God’s people should be, and what they should not be. In our next post we will hear the instructions for the last category: insects.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 11:9-12

9 These shall ye eat of all that are in the waters: whatsoever hath fins and scales in the waters, in the seas, and in the rivers, them shall ye eat.

10 And all that have not fins and scales in the seas, and in the rivers, of all that move in the waters, and of any living thing which is in the waters, they shall be an abomination unto you:

11 They shall be even an abomination unto you; ye shall not eat of their flesh, but ye shall have their carcases in abomination.

12 Whatsoever hath no fins nor scales in the waters, that shall be an abomination unto you.

Yesterday we considered the symbolism of clean and unclean land animals, and how the clean animals represented qualities of righteous and faithful followers of God. But it was not only land animals that had rules of cleanliness. Today we hear the rules for which animals of the sea could be eaten, and which could not.

As with the land animals, there are two important criteria. To be a clean sea creature, it must have scales and fins. This obviously matches up with what typically comes to mind when we say “fish.” Salmon, trout, swordfish, carp, these would all be included. It would not include things like clams, octopuses, or lobsters.

Part of the symbolism of clean sea creatures has to do with the context that they live in. The water is not where man lives, it is not fit for him to dwell there, only to make brief visits to it. It is mysterious and its depths are hidden. The sea could be seen as an analogy for the world, something distinct and different from the heavenly spirit that lives in all of us. Something that we all interact with, but only on a temporary basis, until we return to our eternal home up above.

Given that context, the presence of fins would suggest purposeful, directed, and constant movement. Be in the world to achieve what you need to achieve and then move on, not stopping and becoming attached to it. Not crawling along its darker depths. The scales can represent a boundary or a protection. A wall that keeps the foreign world out. A wall that keeps us shaped the way God made us, not amorphous or filled with the surrounding atmosphere like a jelly fish.

Thus, even with the sea creatures, the rules of cleanliness and uncleanliness once again serve as a symbolic reminder of the qualities that we must strive for to maintain a healthy separation from the world and consecrated to the Lord.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Leviticus 11:1-8

1 And the Lord spake unto Moses and to Aaron, saying unto them,

2 Speak unto the children of Israel, saying, These are the beasts which ye shall eat among all the beasts that are on the earth.

3 Whatsoever parteth the hoof, and is clovenfooted, and cheweth the cud, among the beasts, that shall ye eat.

4 Nevertheless these shall ye not eat of them that chew the cud, or of them that divide the hoof: as the camel, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.

5 And the coney, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.

6 And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.

7 And the swine, though he divide the hoof, and be clovenfooted, yet he cheweth not the cud; he is unclean to you.

8 Of their flesh shall ye not eat, and their carcase shall ye not touch; they are unclean to you.

In this chapter we start to hear the details for which animals would be clean or unclean to ancient Israel. We already saw back in the story of Noah that animal cleanliness was related to which ones could be offered as a sacrifice to the Lord, and today we see that it also determined which animals the people could eat. That is what most people know of these laws as, a dietary restriction, and even Orthodox Jews today are careful to observe these restrictions.

Many have pointed out that having unclean meat is a symbol for the unclean life. Just as the ancient Israelites were to avoid certain flesh, we are meant to avoid certain inappropriate influences, cultures, and trends. We must be careful to not contaminate our spirits with things that erode and confuse them.

But how do the parameters for clean and unclean beasts factor into that symbol? What is it about cloven hooves and chewing cud that reminds one of following a clean lifestyle? Let’s take a closer look.

First, let us consider the cloven hoof. This means that any animal with a paw was forbidden, which would include most predators, such as wolves and lions. Also, anything with a solid hoof, such as a horse was also out. Cloven feet are well suited to uneven terrain, able to flex in the middle between different elevations. They might represent being able to both live in the world and in the covenant, being able to navigate the challenges of making moral decisions.

Chewing the cud means chewing and swallowing food, partially digesting it in the stomach, then regurgitating it and chewing again to break it down further. Though an unseemly eating practice, this can be seen as constantly returning to and reflecting on the principles of the gospel. We take God’s word in once, digest it as best we can at the time, but then pondering on it again to gain even more insights. It can also represent being discerning, not accepting everything that is presented to us, but being able to bring back up anything that feels wrong so that we do not integrate corrupted ideas.

These are powerful symbols when taking individually, but when we combine them together and look at the class of animals that fit these criteria, there is even more to learn. Animals that chew the cud and have cloven hooves include the most docile herd animals, the most easily domesticated, and the most familiar to our species. It includes the cow, the sheep, and the goat. Carnivorous predators and stranger beasts are excluded. We see in these animals a sign that we should also herd together in our churches, that we should work together for the good of the whole, that we should follow a good shepherd, and that we should submit to our master.

When one first reads the laws of clean and unclean beasts it might seem antiquated and strange, but upon closer inspection we saw that the symbolism and lessons embedded in these laws were truly inspired.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Do Not Long for Yesterday

Do not long to escape the troubles of today by a return to yesterday. For it was the culture and choices of “the good old days” that led us to where we are today. The only hope is in building a future that is neither like yesterday nor today, but that has learned from the mistakes of both.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Inevitable Universal Truth

Universal truth is inevitable. If there was no universal truth, then that would be the universal truth.

Given that universal truth is inevitable, all that remains is for us to find out what it is and align ourselves to it.

Posted on by Abe Austin

The Offensively Faithful- The Popular Immoral

Dangerous Trends)

In the last post I gave what I consider to be the strongest evidence that we live in the last days, and the scriptures show us that in those last days, the popular majority will go astray, will believe falsehoods, and will resent the righteous.

If this is true, then each one of us needs to be very careful of the moral trends of our day. We must hold each to scrutiny, and reject many of them, even though it will make us unfavorable with the masses. Of course, I am not saying that every popular trend in the last days is inherently evil. Today it is popular to reject slavery, and that is good. It is good, because it aligns with the nature of God and the words of scripture. But every trend that disparages faith, that denies God, that takes offense to the words of scripture, these are the trends that lead to the selfish and meanspirited population described in the last days.

From my perspective, these popular trends in the West include promotion of homosexuality, feminism, socialism, and transgenderism. Even before considering the substance of each, they have all begun by taking offense to scriptural doctrine, have undermined the commandments of God, and have demonized the faithful. That alone informs us of their deviant motives. And then, when we look at the actual substance, we see that they have directly supported grave sin, including abortion and sexual depravity, and that they have stoked the passions of the depraved, until physical violence has erupted, often targeted at those that do not accept their sin. They have also passed their twisted ideology on the young and the impressionable, leaving them to believe that acceptance of these sins is the only way to be moral.

Realistic Evil)

This raises an important point. I believe that too many of us assume that these trends and sins cannot be the image of apocalyptic evil, because we know people who live within these trends, and they do not seem evil to us. They’re just people, with qualities that we love. But this is by no means a proof of innocence or virtue. People that seem “good” to us can absolutely be aligned with evil trends. To prove this, we need only look at the historical record. We frequently point to people in the past whose ideologies we condemn as evil, such as nazis and slave owners, yet many of them did not view themselves as evil either. They just saw themselves as people, with qualities that they loved, just as we view those supporting the modern anti-God philosophies of today.

We make the mistake of assuming that the majority wicked of the last days will look like caricatures of evil. That they will all be sadistic, maniacal, moustache-twirling cartoon villains. But that just isn’t realistic. The wicked of the final days will almost certainly be like the wicked in all other times: people who feel justified in their time, people who live in a context that makes them believe that they are in the right, people who have other virtues that are used as evidence of being good and correct.

But none of us can evaluate our righteousness from within our own context. As the preacher taught, “every way of a man is right in his own eyes,” (Proverbs 21:2). In our own historical analysis, we can see that culture and consensus can override conscience and leave people feeling that even the most terrible of actions are right. What we require is an external standard to compare ourselves to. An unchanging yardstick that is synonymous with universal good. Such a standard has been given to us in the words and commandments of God. When our own conception of good does not align with what God has given to us, it is us who are in the wrong, not Him.

In conclusion, I do believe that we live in the last days, and in our day there are many who discredit and disparage the Lord, who support beliefs that are directly contrary to His word. Agreeing with these voices is popular, it is what we are taught from our earliest years that we are supposed to do. That creates a context that blinds us, that makes us genuinely call good evil, and evil good. Just as was foretold for the final days. When we see that our belief come from popular consensus, and that it is antagonistic to the scriptures, and that all people in history have thought that they were in the right, even the most evil, that should give us serious pause. Even though it might feel wrong to us, we should consider the possibility that we are, in fact, the ones in the wrong, and we should experiment with God’s law, to see if it does not soften our hearts and change our minds.

And if we do not, then Armageddon awaits.