Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Exodus 34:29-30

29 And it came to pass, when Moses came down from mount Sinai with the two tables of testimony in Moses’ hand, when he came down from the mount, that Moses wist not that the skin of his face shone while he talked with him.

30 And when Aaron and all the children of Israel saw Moses, behold, the skin of his face shone; and they were afraid to come nigh him.

As I mentioned in yesterday’s post, it seems that Moses must have been somewhat transfigured to survive 40 days and nights in the top of the mountain without even water. And so, it is understandable that when he descended back down to the people his face was shining, such that people were too afraid to even approach him. Moses may have been back among the common man, but the glory of God still burned within him.

While I certainly have never been transfigured like this, I am well aware of the glow within the soul that follows a period of deep spiritual connection. It is unquestionably the best that I have ever felt, and it can continue for days after the original experience. I’ve never had that flush last forever, but there have been personal changes made in that time which have continued with me to this day (including the writing of this blog). While we are not told whether Moses’s face ever returned to normal, my assumption would be that after some time it did.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Exodus 33:21-23

21 And the Lord said, Behold, there is a place by me, and thou shalt stand upon a rock:

22 And it shall come to pass, while my glory passeth by, that I will put thee in a clift of the rock, and will cover thee with my hand while I pass by:

23 And I will take away mine hand, and thou shalt see my back parts: but my face shall not be seen.

In yesterday’s post I suggested that Moses’s request to see the glory of the Lord might have been in reference to an upcoming meeting between the two, not the one currently transpiring within the tabernacle. Today’s verses seem to support that idea, with God talking about placing Moses in the cleft of a rock. It doesn’t seem that geographical feature would have been present in the tabernacle, but it certainly would have been found up in the top of the mountain, which is where Moses will go immediately after this meeting.

This idea of placing Moses in the cleft of a rock and covering him with God’s hand is clearly symbolic. A cleft in the rock face is a wound in the body. There immediately comes to mind the image of Jesus Christ, pierced in the side while on the cross. We are all of us tucked within that wound, our frailty and impurity being covered by the works of Christ as Moses was by the hand of the Lord, giving us our only hope of surviving the image of God and receiving a good reward.

Even the fact that Moses was only permitted to see the back of God, and not His face, seems symbolic for our experience in following a Lord that we do not perfectly understand. We generally understand God, but certainly not in His totality. We long to see His face but feel we have only a general sense of His form. We follow according to what little we do understand, looking forward to the time when we will fully see “face to face, and shall know Him even as also we are known.“

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Exodus 33:18-20

18 And he said, I beseech thee, shew me thy glory.

19 And he said, I will make all my goodness pass before thee, and I will proclaim the name of the Lord before thee; and will be gracious to whom I will be gracious, and will shew mercy on whom I will shew mercy.

20 And he said, Thou canst not see my face: for there shall no man see me, and live.

Moses now asks that he might see the Lord’s glory but is told that no one will be able to see His face and live. This passage is a bit confusing, because when Moses first came into the tabernacle, we were told that he spoke with God “face to face.” Some have tried to dismiss the earlier “face to face” reference as not being literal, as only meaning “forthright and openly.” That seems like an unnatural interpretation to me, though. It isn’t derived from the original Greek and only seems to be proposed to try and make amends with today’s verses.

I, however, wonder if this seeming inconsistency is actually pointing towards different degrees of divine manifestation. When Moses conversed with the Lord here in the tabernacle, did he perceive the Lord spiritually as opposed to literally? Was it something like a vision, such as Stephen had when he perceived both God the Father and Jesus Christ at the time of his martyrdom? Was Moses requesting to see God’s form in the flesh, and was learning that His presence could only be tolerated spiritually, as any physical manifestation would be fatal?

Something that supports the idea that Moses was referring to a different sort of appearance than what was going on in the tabernacle is that this was a preliminary conversation between him and the Lord. Immediately following this account, Moses will travel back up into the mountain, where he and the Lord will again confirm everything that has been agreed on here. So, given that this is the pre-agreement before the formal contract, it makes sense that it could also be a spiritual presence before the physical, and different rules would apply for each.

Posted on by Abe Austin

Scriptural Analysis- Exodus 33:11

11 And the Lord spake unto Moses face to face, as a man speaketh unto his friend. And he turned again into the camp: but his servant Joshua, the son of Nun, a young man, departed not out of the tabernacle.

The closeness between Moses and the Lord is remarkable. We have not heard of anyone on such equal footing with the Lord since Abraham, whom God met with directly and invited counsel from.

At the end of this verse, it talks about Moses exiting the tabernacle, but the following verses seem to go back to describe the conversation that just took place. It may be that this is the transition between two different accounts that had been given of the same event.

Apparently, Joshua came with Moses into the tent. Whether he was within the veil and also face-to-face with God is unspecified, though when Moses was up in the mountain it sounded as if Joshua was a bit withdrawn from the meeting with the Lord, so my assumption would be that he was not inside of the veil, but in an adjoining room. Apparently, after the conversation in the following verses and Moses’s departure from the tabernacle, Joshua remained behind in the tabernacle. For what purpose, we do not know.