Scriptural Analysis- Exodus 17:10-12

10 So Joshua did as Moses had said to him, and fought with Amalek: and Moses, Aaron, and Hur went up to the top of the hill.

11 And it came to pass, when Moses held up his hand, that Israel prevailed: and when he let down his hand, Amalek prevailed.

12 But Moses’ hands were heavy; and they took a stone, and put it under him, and he sat thereon; and Aaron and Hur stayed up his hands, the one on the one side, and the other on the other side; and his hands were steady until the going down of the sun.

Moses, Aaron, and Hur climbed to the top of a hill, presumably to have a view of the battle below, and Moses raised his hands, which corresponded with Israel prevailing against their enemy. However, keeping one’s hands elevated for a prolonged time is actually a very difficult physical feat, let alone for someone quite advanced in age, as Moses was. So his hands grew heavy, and when he let them down Israel began to fall to their enemies.

This raises the question of what is the connection between the position of Moses’s hands and the prevailing of the Israelite army? Much like his staff, it seems likely that this was a physical representation of an abstract concept. Perhaps God was using the connection between raised hands and prevailing in battle to teach a lesson that a nation is subject to the strength of its leader, and a church to the strength of its prophet. When our government and spiritual leaders are weak and flawed, we all suffer. When they lack the fortitude to stand for their flock, then wolves begin to sneak in among the sheep.

And what does it mean to be weak and flawed? To not have one’s hands, or one’s labor, directed heavenward. When we lower our hands to the lower, earthward things, that is the precursor to destruction. If our leaders are more concerned with worldly wealth or social trends than acts of righteousness, the people are left vulnerable to their enemies.

And this is where Aaron and Hur come in. Moses couldn’t keep his hands up forever, so they were there to lend him the strength that he lacked, to keep his hands heavenward. So, too, the future Israelite kings were meant to take counsel and direction from the prophet, having their focus raised heavenward so that the people would follow in the right path. Leaders today should also surround themselves with those who have as their primary concern what is right, what is true, and what is good, according to the Lord.

Scriptural Analysis- Genesis 32:26-28

26 And he said, Let me go, for the day breaketh. And he said, I will not let thee go, except thou bless me.

27 And he said unto him, What is thy name? And he said, Jacob.

28 And he said, Thy name shall be called no more Jacob, but Israel: for as a prince hast thou power with God and with men, and hast prevailed.

Even after his thigh was dislocated Jacob did not give up the fight! We don’t know at what point of night this wrestling match began, but it seems to have continued for a very long while. Now the sun is rising, heralding the day in which Jacob must stand before his brother Esau, and he will not quit the fight until he receives some assurance that all will be well.

The messenger asks Jacob his name, and Jacob delivers the only one he has ever had, the one given of his father. Now, like his grandfather Abram, Jacob receives another from God. The name Israel is comprised of two parts, “isra” which means to fight or strive, and “el” which means God. Together they mean “God strives” or “God shall fight.” Jacob had prevailed with God, and now God would fight for Jacob’s cause.

The angel does not make any promises about the meeting with Esau, though. Jacob is going to have to face what follows, he won’t be let off the hook there, but he is being assured that God will prevail with him through whatever that meeting entails.

Interestingly, Jacob still continues to be referred to as “Jacob” throughout the rest of his biblical record and not “Israel.” This is different from Abram and Sarai, who are exclusively referred to as Abraham and Sarah after their new names are given. Some have pointed out that the bible seems to treat Jacob as the man, but Israel as his legacy, almost as though the persona that he exuded past mortality is the identity which is to be referred to as Israel. Or maybe it signifies that Jacob had trouble embracing the new identity God had called him to. Or maybe it’s just a clerical error. Or maybe it’s something else entirely, I don’t believe we have any definitive answer.