10 But the goat, on which the lot fell to be the scapegoat, shall be presented alive before the Lord, to make an atonement with him, and to let him go for a scapegoat into the wilderness. 

20 And when he hath made an end of reconciling the holy place, and the tabernacle of the congregation, and the altar, he shall bring the live goat: 

21 And Aaron shall lay both his hands upon the head of the live goat, and confess over him all the iniquities of the children of Israel, and all their transgressions in all their sins, putting them upon the head of the goat, and shall send him away by the hand of a fit man into the wilderness: 

22 And the goat shall bear upon him all their iniquities unto a land not inhabited: and he shall let go the goat in the wilderness. 

26 And he that let go the goat for the scapegoat shall wash his clothes, and bathe his flesh in water, and afterward come into the camp.

Today we learn about one of the most unique and interesting elements of the Old Testament sacrifice system, which is the scapegoat. In the last post we heard that on the Day of Atonement, two goats would be presented as potential sin offerings, but only one would be selected, at random, to fulfill that purpose. The other was the scapegoat, which we read today had all of the sins of Israel declared upon its head. Then it was led by the hand to the wilderness and there released.

Thus, the scapegoat had both a burden and a freedom not afforded to the other goat. The image of this goat is so intriguing that even today we use the term “scapegoat” to refer to someone assigned to take the blame for a group. As I said before, I am first detailing all of the ritual actions performed on the Day of Atonement, and only afterward will I delve into all of the symbolic meaning, but obviously this matter of the two goats is of prominent significance.